<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 23:36:21 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>On Wisdom - Episodes Tagged with “Climate Change”</title>
    <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/tags/climate%20change</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>On Wisdom features a social and cognitive scientist in Toronto and an educator in London discussing the latest empirical science regarding the nature of wisdom. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London, UK. The podcast thrives on a diet of freewheeling conversation on wisdom, decision-making, wellbeing, and society and includes regular guests spots with leading behavioral scientists from the field of wisdom research and beyond. Welcome to The On Wisdom Podcast.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>What does science tell us about wisdom?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>On Wisdom features a social and cognitive scientist in Toronto and an educator in London discussing the latest empirical science regarding the nature of wisdom. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London, UK. The podcast thrives on a diet of freewheeling conversation on wisdom, decision-making, wellbeing, and society and includes regular guests spots with leading behavioral scientists from the field of wisdom research and beyond. Welcome to The On Wisdom Podcast.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, happiness, philosophy, wisdom, decision-making, reasoning, society</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>charlesdavidcassidy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>61: Beyond Bias: Group Identity, Wisdom, and the Climate Crisis (with Leaf Van Boven and David Sherman)</title>
  <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/61</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">792a7299-354d-45df-99c5-8c3fece569f8</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/792a7299-354d-45df-99c5-8c3fece569f8.mp3" length="41164716" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Beyond Bias: Group Identity, Wisdom, and the Climate Crisis (with Leaf Van Boven and David Sherman)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Can our political identities get in the way of wise action, even on existential issues like climate change? Leaf Van Boven and David Sherman join Igor and Charles to unpack how we perceive environmental policy through the lenses of group identity and social norms, revealing how misperceptions fuel inaction. Igor considers how group beliefs can override personal values, Leaf explores the power of asking, “What if I’m wrong?”, David suggests we may be following louder voices over wiser ones, and Charles wonders if we’re wired to stick to our “tribe” or if we can really think beyond our social bubbles. Welcome to Episode 61.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:08:36</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>Can our political identities get in the way of wise action, even on existential issues like climate change? Leaf Van Boven and David Sherman join Igor and Charles to unpack how we perceive environmental policy through the lenses of group identity and social norms, revealing how misperceptions fuel inaction. Igor considers how group beliefs can override personal values, Leaf explores the power of asking, “What if I’m wrong?”, David suggests we may be following louder voices over wiser ones, and Charles wonders if we’re wired to stick to our “tribe” or if we can really think beyond our social bubbles. Welcome to Episode 61. Special Guests: David Sherman and Leaf Van Boven.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, climate crisis, leaf van boven, david sherman, climate change, public policy, environmental policy, COVID-19, public health, public, politicians, the media, activists, activism ,  Social Norms, Political Identity, Group Dynamics, Misperceptions, Collective Action, Tribalism</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can our political identities get in the way of wise action, even on existential issues like climate change? Leaf Van Boven and David Sherman join Igor and Charles to unpack how we perceive environmental policy through the lenses of group identity and social norms, revealing how misperceptions fuel inaction. Igor considers how group beliefs can override personal values, Leaf explores the power of asking, “What if I’m wrong?”, David suggests we may be following louder voices over wiser ones, and Charles wonders if we’re wired to stick to our “tribe” or if we can really think beyond our social bubbles. Welcome to Episode 61.</p><p>Special Guests: David Sherman and Leaf Van Boven.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Leaf Van Boven | University of Colorado Boulder" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.colorado.edu/psych-neuro/leaf-van-boven">Leaf Van Boven | University of Colorado Boulder</a></li><li><a title="Environment, Decision, Judgment, and Identity Lab (EDJI) | University of Colorado Boulder" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.colorado.edu/lab/edji/">Environment, Decision, Judgment, and Identity Lab (EDJI) | University of Colorado Boulder</a></li><li><a title="David Sherman | UC Santa Barbara" rel="nofollow" href="https://psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/david-sherman">David Sherman | UC Santa Barbara</a></li><li><a title="Sherman Lab | UC Santa Barbara" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/">Sherman Lab | UC Santa Barbara</a></li><li><a title="Social Science Climate Lab" rel="nofollow" href="https://socialclimatelab.psych.ucsb.edu/">Social Science Climate Lab</a></li><li><a title="The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective - Sherman, Van Boven (2024)" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/publications/1031">The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective - Sherman, Van Boven (2024)</a></li><li><a title="Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy - Cole, Ehret, Sherman, Van Boven (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/publications/866">Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy - Cole, Ehret, Sherman, Van Boven (2022)</a></li><li><a title="Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries - Flores, A., Cole J. C., Dickert S., Eom K., Jiga-Boy G. M., Kogut T., Loria R., Mayorga M., Pedersen E. J., Pereira B., Rubaltelli E., Sherman D. K., Slovic P., Vastfjall D., &amp; Van Boven L. (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/publications/806">Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries - Flores, A., Cole J. C., Dickert S., Eom K., Jiga-Boy G. M., Kogut T., Loria R., Mayorga M., Pedersen E. J., Pereira B., Rubaltelli E., Sherman D. K., Slovic P., Vastfjall D., &amp; Van Boven L. (2022)</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can our political identities get in the way of wise action, even on existential issues like climate change? Leaf Van Boven and David Sherman join Igor and Charles to unpack how we perceive environmental policy through the lenses of group identity and social norms, revealing how misperceptions fuel inaction. Igor considers how group beliefs can override personal values, Leaf explores the power of asking, “What if I’m wrong?”, David suggests we may be following louder voices over wiser ones, and Charles wonders if we’re wired to stick to our “tribe” or if we can really think beyond our social bubbles. Welcome to Episode 61.</p><p>Special Guests: David Sherman and Leaf Van Boven.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Leaf Van Boven | University of Colorado Boulder" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.colorado.edu/psych-neuro/leaf-van-boven">Leaf Van Boven | University of Colorado Boulder</a></li><li><a title="Environment, Decision, Judgment, and Identity Lab (EDJI) | University of Colorado Boulder" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.colorado.edu/lab/edji/">Environment, Decision, Judgment, and Identity Lab (EDJI) | University of Colorado Boulder</a></li><li><a title="David Sherman | UC Santa Barbara" rel="nofollow" href="https://psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/david-sherman">David Sherman | UC Santa Barbara</a></li><li><a title="Sherman Lab | UC Santa Barbara" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/">Sherman Lab | UC Santa Barbara</a></li><li><a title="Social Science Climate Lab" rel="nofollow" href="https://socialclimatelab.psych.ucsb.edu/">Social Science Climate Lab</a></li><li><a title="The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective - Sherman, Van Boven (2024)" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/publications/1031">The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective - Sherman, Van Boven (2024)</a></li><li><a title="Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy - Cole, Ehret, Sherman, Van Boven (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/publications/866">Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy - Cole, Ehret, Sherman, Van Boven (2022)</a></li><li><a title="Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries - Flores, A., Cole J. C., Dickert S., Eom K., Jiga-Boy G. M., Kogut T., Loria R., Mayorga M., Pedersen E. J., Pereira B., Rubaltelli E., Sherman D. K., Slovic P., Vastfjall D., &amp; Van Boven L. (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/publications/806">Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries - Flores, A., Cole J. C., Dickert S., Eom K., Jiga-Boy G. M., Kogut T., Loria R., Mayorga M., Pedersen E. J., Pereira B., Rubaltelli E., Sherman D. K., Slovic P., Vastfjall D., &amp; Van Boven L. (2022)</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 15: Wisdom, Bullshit &amp; Beliefs (with Gordon Pennycook)</title>
  <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/15</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">16d6c0e1-8d2e-4a99-8234-c622d99fdcac</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/16d6c0e1-8d2e-4a99-8234-c622d99fdcac.mp3" length="21663160" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Wisdom, Bullshit &amp; Beliefs (with Gordon Pennycook)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>45:07</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.
 Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>psychology, social psychology, wisdom, motivated reasoning, cognitive reflection test, fake news, misinformation, climate change, dual process theory, psuedo-profound bullshit, wisdom of chopra</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we&#39;re motivated to think they&#39;re real, or because we don&#39;t bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</p><p>Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Gordon Pennycook&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://gordonpennycook.net/">Gordon Pennycook's Site</a></li><li><a title="On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)</a></li><li><a title="On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=fhass_huma_publ">On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)</a></li><li><a title="Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra" rel="nofollow" href="http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php">Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra</a></li><li><a title="Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Vp41OPLdo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=57m7s">Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video</a></li><li><a title="Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html">Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times</a></li><li><a title="People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-furthest-apart-on-climate-views-are-often-the-most-educated/">People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)</a></li><li><a title="Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935897">Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) </a></li><li><a title="Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1fc/5af426cfb24458086767a3aa4982eb167596.pdf">Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571664">The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/The-Mythical-Dual-Process-Typology_2018_Trends-in-Cognitive-Sciences.pdf">The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we&#39;re motivated to think they&#39;re real, or because we don&#39;t bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</p><p>Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Gordon Pennycook&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://gordonpennycook.net/">Gordon Pennycook's Site</a></li><li><a title="On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)</a></li><li><a title="On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=fhass_huma_publ">On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)</a></li><li><a title="Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra" rel="nofollow" href="http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php">Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra</a></li><li><a title="Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Vp41OPLdo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=57m7s">Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video</a></li><li><a title="Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html">Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times</a></li><li><a title="People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-furthest-apart-on-climate-views-are-often-the-most-educated/">People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)</a></li><li><a title="Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935897">Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) </a></li><li><a title="Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1fc/5af426cfb24458086767a3aa4982eb167596.pdf">Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571664">The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/The-Mythical-Dual-Process-Typology_2018_Trends-in-Cognitive-Sciences.pdf">The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
