<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app03</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 03:21:41 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>On Wisdom - Episodes Tagged with “Misinformation”</title>
    <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/tags/misinformation</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp;amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>What does science tell us about wisdom?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp;amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, happiness, philosophy, wisdom, decision-making, reasoning, society; judgment; metacognition</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>charlesdavidcassidy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 15: Wisdom, Bullshit &amp; Beliefs (with Gordon Pennycook)</title>
  <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/15</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">16d6c0e1-8d2e-4a99-8234-c622d99fdcac</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/16d6c0e1-8d2e-4a99-8234-c622d99fdcac.mp3" length="21663160" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Wisdom, Bullshit &amp; Beliefs (with Gordon Pennycook)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>45:07</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.&lt;br&gt;
 Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>psychology, social psychology, wisdom, motivated reasoning, cognitive reflection test, fake news, misinformation, climate change, dual process theory, psuedo-profound bullshit, wisdom of chopra</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</p><p>Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Gordon Pennycook&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://gordonpennycook.net/">Gordon Pennycook's Site
</a></li><li><a title="On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)
</a></li><li><a title="On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=fhass_huma_publ">On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)
</a></li><li><a title="Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra" rel="nofollow" href="http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php">Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra
</a></li><li><a title="Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Vp41OPLdo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=57m7s">Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video
</a></li><li><a title="Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html">Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times
</a></li><li><a title="People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-furthest-apart-on-climate-views-are-often-the-most-educated/">People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)
</a></li><li><a title="Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935897">Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) 
</a></li><li><a title="Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1fc/5af426cfb24458086767a3aa4982eb167596.pdf">Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)
</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571664">The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)
</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/The-Mythical-Dual-Process-Typology_2018_Trends-in-Cognitive-Sciences.pdf">The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</p><p>Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Gordon Pennycook&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://gordonpennycook.net/">Gordon Pennycook's Site
</a></li><li><a title="On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)
</a></li><li><a title="On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=fhass_huma_publ">On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)
</a></li><li><a title="Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra" rel="nofollow" href="http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php">Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra
</a></li><li><a title="Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Vp41OPLdo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=57m7s">Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video
</a></li><li><a title="Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html">Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times
</a></li><li><a title="People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-furthest-apart-on-climate-views-are-often-the-most-educated/">People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)
</a></li><li><a title="Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935897">Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) 
</a></li><li><a title="Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1fc/5af426cfb24458086767a3aa4982eb167596.pdf">Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)
</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571664">The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)
</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/The-Mythical-Dual-Process-Typology_2018_Trends-in-Cognitive-Sciences.pdf">The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
