<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:18:41 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>On Wisdom - Episodes Tagged with “Motivated Reasoning”</title>
    <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/tags/motivated%20reasoning</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>On Wisdom features a social and cognitive scientist in Toronto and an educator in London discussing the latest empirical science regarding the nature of wisdom. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London, UK. The podcast thrives on a diet of freewheeling conversation on wisdom, decision-making, wellbeing, and society and includes regular guests spots with leading behavioral scientists from the field of wisdom research and beyond. Welcome to The On Wisdom Podcast.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>What does science tell us about wisdom?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>On Wisdom features a social and cognitive scientist in Toronto and an educator in London discussing the latest empirical science regarding the nature of wisdom. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London, UK. The podcast thrives on a diet of freewheeling conversation on wisdom, decision-making, wellbeing, and society and includes regular guests spots with leading behavioral scientists from the field of wisdom research and beyond. Welcome to The On Wisdom Podcast.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, happiness, philosophy, wisdom, decision-making, reasoning, society</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>charlesdavidcassidy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 18: The End of the World is Nigh: Polarised Tribes, Passionate Words, and the Partisan Brain (with Jay Van Bavel)</title>
  <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/18</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">7704fc91-c204-4189-81fe-8f135ddfc9d2</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/7704fc91-c204-4189-81fe-8f135ddfc9d2.mp3" length="30708633" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>The End of the World is Nigh: Polarised Tribes, Passionate Words, and the Partisan Brain (with Jay Van Bavel)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>How did politics get so damn polarised? Jay Van Bavel joins Igor and Charles to discuss political polarisation, the partisan brain, the inexorable rise of superheroes in dark times, the misperceptions of polarisation levels, and how to reach out to other tribes. Igor highlights the partisanship-transcending benefits of a Watchmen-style alien invasion, Jay proposes the judicious use of ‘off-ramps’ when engaging with loved-ones from across the political divide, and Charles learns that even the abstract purity of Mathematics is not immune from the tentacles of partisanship when guns are involved. Welcome to Episode 18.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:03:58</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>How did politics get so damn polarised? Jay Van Bavel joins Igor and Charles to discuss political polarisation, the partisan brain, the inexorable rise of superheroes in dark times, the misperceptions of polarisation levels, and how to reach out to other tribes. Igor highlights the partisanship-transcending benefits of a Watchmen-style alien invasion, Jay proposes the judicious use of ‘off-ramps’ when engaging with loved-ones from across the political divide, and Charles learns that even the abstract purity of Mathematics is not immune from the tentacles of partisanship when guns are involved. Welcome to Episode 18. Special Guest: Jay Van Bavel.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>culture, psychology, social psychology, wisdom, partisanship, polarisation, off-ramps, echo chambers, moral-emotional language, social media, bias, politics, mathematics, motivated reasoning, superheroes, perception, neuroscience, Jay Van Bavel, </itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>How did politics get so damn polarised? Jay Van Bavel joins Igor and Charles to discuss political polarisation, the partisan brain, the inexorable rise of superheroes in dark times, the misperceptions of polarisation levels, and how to reach out to other tribes. Igor highlights the partisanship-transcending benefits of a Watchmen-style alien invasion, Jay proposes the judicious use of ‘off-ramps’ when engaging with loved-ones from across the political divide, and Charles learns that even the abstract purity of Mathematics is not immune from the tentacles of partisanship when guns are involved. Welcome to Episode 18.</p><p>Special Guest: Jay Van Bavel.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Social Perception and Evaluation Lab" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/index.html">Social Perception and Evaluation Lab</a></li><li><a title="The dangers of the partisan brain | Jay Van Bavel | TEDxSkoll - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOkFWZLJk8I">The dangers of the partisan brain | Jay Van Bavel | TEDxSkoll - YouTube</a></li><li><a title="The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief - ScienceDirect" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661318300172">The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief - ScienceDirect</a></li><li><a title="Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks - Brady, Wills, Jost, Tucker and Van Bavel (2016)" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/documents/Brady.etal.2017.PNAS.pdf">Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks - Brady, Wills, Jost, Tucker and Van Bavel (2016)</a></li><li><a title="An Ideological Asymmetry in the Diffusion of Moralized Content on Social Media Among Political Leaders - Brady, Wills, Burkart, Jost, Van Bavel (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/documents/Brady.etal.2019.JEPG.pdf">An Ideological Asymmetry in the Diffusion of Moralized Content on Social Media Among Political Leaders - Brady, Wills, Burkart, Jost, Van Bavel (2018)</a></li><li><a title="How to go viral: stick to your morals but add a hint of emotion | WIRED UK" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.wired.co.uk/article/moral-emotional-content-is-the-key-to-going-viral">How to go viral: stick to your morals but add a hint of emotion | WIRED UK</a></li><li><a title="What Brexit can teach us about the psychology of fear - Vox" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/6/25/12023768/brexit-psychology-fear">What Brexit can teach us about the psychology of fear - Vox</a></li><li><a title="Letters to Young Scientists | Science | AAAS" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencemag.org/tags/letters-young-scientists">Letters to Young Scientists | Science | AAAS</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>How did politics get so damn polarised? Jay Van Bavel joins Igor and Charles to discuss political polarisation, the partisan brain, the inexorable rise of superheroes in dark times, the misperceptions of polarisation levels, and how to reach out to other tribes. Igor highlights the partisanship-transcending benefits of a Watchmen-style alien invasion, Jay proposes the judicious use of ‘off-ramps’ when engaging with loved-ones from across the political divide, and Charles learns that even the abstract purity of Mathematics is not immune from the tentacles of partisanship when guns are involved. Welcome to Episode 18.</p><p>Special Guest: Jay Van Bavel.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Social Perception and Evaluation Lab" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/index.html">Social Perception and Evaluation Lab</a></li><li><a title="The dangers of the partisan brain | Jay Van Bavel | TEDxSkoll - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOkFWZLJk8I">The dangers of the partisan brain | Jay Van Bavel | TEDxSkoll - YouTube</a></li><li><a title="The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief - ScienceDirect" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661318300172">The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief - ScienceDirect</a></li><li><a title="Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks - Brady, Wills, Jost, Tucker and Van Bavel (2016)" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/documents/Brady.etal.2017.PNAS.pdf">Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks - Brady, Wills, Jost, Tucker and Van Bavel (2016)</a></li><li><a title="An Ideological Asymmetry in the Diffusion of Moralized Content on Social Media Among Political Leaders - Brady, Wills, Burkart, Jost, Van Bavel (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.nyu.edu/vanbavel/lab/documents/Brady.etal.2019.JEPG.pdf">An Ideological Asymmetry in the Diffusion of Moralized Content on Social Media Among Political Leaders - Brady, Wills, Burkart, Jost, Van Bavel (2018)</a></li><li><a title="How to go viral: stick to your morals but add a hint of emotion | WIRED UK" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.wired.co.uk/article/moral-emotional-content-is-the-key-to-going-viral">How to go viral: stick to your morals but add a hint of emotion | WIRED UK</a></li><li><a title="What Brexit can teach us about the psychology of fear - Vox" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.vox.com/2016/6/25/12023768/brexit-psychology-fear">What Brexit can teach us about the psychology of fear - Vox</a></li><li><a title="Letters to Young Scientists | Science | AAAS" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencemag.org/tags/letters-young-scientists">Letters to Young Scientists | Science | AAAS</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 15: Wisdom, Bullshit &amp; Beliefs (with Gordon Pennycook)</title>
  <link>https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/15</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">16d6c0e1-8d2e-4a99-8234-c622d99fdcac</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/16d6c0e1-8d2e-4a99-8234-c622d99fdcac.mp3" length="21663160" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Wisdom, Bullshit &amp; Beliefs (with Gordon Pennycook)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>45:07</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we're motivated to think they're real, or because we don't bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.
 Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>psychology, social psychology, wisdom, motivated reasoning, cognitive reflection test, fake news, misinformation, climate change, dual process theory, psuedo-profound bullshit, wisdom of chopra</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we&#39;re motivated to think they&#39;re real, or because we don&#39;t bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</p><p>Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Gordon Pennycook&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://gordonpennycook.net/">Gordon Pennycook's Site</a></li><li><a title="On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)</a></li><li><a title="On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=fhass_huma_publ">On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)</a></li><li><a title="Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra" rel="nofollow" href="http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php">Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra</a></li><li><a title="Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Vp41OPLdo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=57m7s">Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video</a></li><li><a title="Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html">Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times</a></li><li><a title="People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-furthest-apart-on-climate-views-are-often-the-most-educated/">People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)</a></li><li><a title="Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935897">Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) </a></li><li><a title="Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1fc/5af426cfb24458086767a3aa4982eb167596.pdf">Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571664">The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/The-Mythical-Dual-Process-Typology_2018_Trends-in-Cognitive-Sciences.pdf">The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>‘Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena?’ Does it, really?! Why do some people fall for pseudo-profound bullshit and others don’t? When we share fake news stories, is this because we&#39;re motivated to think they&#39;re real, or because we don&#39;t bother to think at all? And why do scientists fight tooth-and-nail over the mechanisms involved, such as “System I vs. System II”, “Fast vs. Slow” and other frameworks? Gordon Pennycook joins Igor and Charles to discuss the critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter, the cognitive reflection test, the random Deepak Chopra quote generator, the Ig Nobel prize, motivated reasoning, climate change beliefs, academic turf wars among dual process theorists, and how to stop yourself from compulsively retweeting fake news. Igor suggests that Gord only thought of studying bullshit after disbelief at one of Igor’s early talks, Gord reminds us that even the most enlightened social media platforms are in no hurry to help people STOP sharing news, and Charles unexpectedly finds common ground with the Chinese government. Welcome to Episode 15.</p><p>Special Guest: Gordon Pennycook.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Gordon Pennycook&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://gordonpennycook.net/">Gordon Pennycook's Site</a></li><li><a title="On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html">On Bullshit - Harry G. Frankfurt (2005)</a></li><li><a title="On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=fhass_huma_publ">On the Reception and Detection of Pseudoprofound Bullshit - Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, Fugelsang (2015)</a></li><li><a title="Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra" rel="nofollow" href="http://wisdomofchopra.com/index.php">Random Deepak Chopra Quote Generator - Wisdom of Chopra</a></li><li><a title="Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9Vp41OPLdo&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;t=57m7s">Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony 2016 - Video</a></li><li><a title="Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html">Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times</a></li><li><a title="People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-furthest-apart-on-climate-views-are-often-the-most-educated/">People Furthest Apart on Climate Views Are Often the Most Educated - Scientific American (2017)</a></li><li><a title="Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935897">Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning - Pennycook &amp; Rand (2018) </a></li><li><a title="Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1fc/5af426cfb24458086767a3aa4982eb167596.pdf">Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking - Pennycook, Fugelsang, Koehler (2015)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571664">The Mythical Number Two - Melnikoff &amp; Bargh (2018)</a></li><li><a title="The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)" rel="nofollow" href="https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/575/The-Mythical-Dual-Process-Typology_2018_Trends-in-Cognitive-Sciences.pdf">The Mythical DualProcess Typology Gordon Pennycook, De Neys, Evans, Stanovich, Thompson (2018)</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
